Assignment 2 Rubric
This is the update of the personas and tasks if needed. The grading of the update will look at what you changed and why you changed it to establish a grade
|Outstanding work on updating. The changes show a very deep understanding of the reasons for change and create exceptionally good personas and tasks.||Excellent changes. The changes show a deep understanding of the reasons for change and create very good personas and tasks.||Excellent changes in most respect. The changes show a deep understanding of the reasons for change and create very good personas and tasks.||Very good performance. The changes show a very good understanding of the reasons for change and create very good personas and tasks.||Good performance. Changes which are well justified and make good personas and tasks||Good performance overall, but some weaknesses. The changes improve the tasks and personas without much or any justification||Satisfactory performance. Some updates that improve but mostly not needed||Adequate evidence of learning. The changes make things worse||Poor / Well below understanding. All changes make things worse|
| Design Coverage
This is the coverage of the tasks and personas needs. Does the design reflect the needs of the personas and cover all the tasks specified. The section includes an assessment of the flow of the design and the information architecture.
|Outstanding coverage. Every aspect of the design is covered by the storyboard or overview. All pages have a rough layout and show the links between them||Excellent performance for coverage. All important aspects covered. Excellent storyboard or overview||Excellent performance in most respects for coverage. All important aspects covered. Excellent storyboard or overview in most respects.||Very good performance for coverage. All important aspects covered. Very good storyboard or overview||Good performance for coverage. Could be missing some tasks or the mismatches between the overview and the screens shown.||Good performance overall for coverage. Bits missing and not aligned with the tasks||A few screens and a vague overview||Adequate for coverage. A few screens shown but not enough to be useful||Poor / Well below standard. No screens or coverage|
| Design Quality
This area is focused on the quality of the design. This includes layout, navigation, functionality, colour palette, fonts and style. This does not mean every page needs to be fully realised at full quality. A single page with all the components on it is enough to show the quality of the design.
|Outstanding design quality. Layout clear, UI contains all the details, colours and fonts explained, clear icon, exceptionally well presented||Excellent design quality. Clearly laid out page, good icons/buttons/ input/controls. Excellent language on inputs etc. Colour palette with justification||Excellent design quality in most respects. Clearly laid out page, good icons/buttons/ input/controls. Excellent language on inputs etc. Colour palette with justification||Very Good quality design. layout very good, buttons very good quality||Good quality design. Layout good, buttons good quality||Good quality design overall. However layout muddled, buttons but not good quality. Pages are understandable but no good||Satisfactory quality. Barely functional layout of pages||Adequate quality. Confusing and inconsistent pages||Poor / Well below standard. No pages displayed or shown|
In this section describe the pros and cons of the design you have proposed. What have you learnt about the problem by proposing a solution? Reflect on any changes you made to the personas or tasks based on creating these initial design documents.
|Outstanding reflection on the learning from the design. Understanding of design compromises that were made and the effect of limitations.||Excellent reflection on learning. Understanding of the design, and compromises.||Excellent reflection on learning in most respects. Understanding of the design, and compromises.||Very Good reflection on learning. Understanding of the design, and compromises.||Good reflection on either design or learning but not good on both.||Good reflection overall. Some reflection but not well written or generic and not meaningful||Satisfactory on reflection. Minimal reflection with no examination of the learning or the decisions||Adequate on reflection. No real reflection. Comments on student work without context||Poor / Well below standard. Student does not show any learning|