| SWEN303 Ass 1 Rubric
| System Description
|| This it the introduction which includes the description of the system, the business objectives and stakeholders. This also has the model overview mapping out the system.
|| Exceptional description and communication of the project. Exceptionally clear and well written and presented
|| An excellent description which covers all the relevant details, the maps/description of the system is clear. Stakeholders concerns are clearly identified and well presented. Justification for a business case is very well described.
|| Good description. Good mapping of cases/ description of the system.
|| The description covers the system reasonably well. The business case is simple but present
|| Minimal description. Overview covers minimal personas and tasks.
|| limited description without overview or clear stakeholder information
|| No clear description of the system
|| These are the personas that have been generated for the project. They need to reflect the relevant users of the system
|| Exceptional justification and demonstration of research into persona development
|| Very good personas with clear reasons for the characteristics and good coverage
|| very good personas, with good coverage
|| Personas are generic and not clearly justified
|| Minimal persona description and coverage with some justification
|| minimal personas without clear description or reason
|| No personas or merely copied from another source
|| These are the tasks that were selected to be expanded. They cover the core area of functionality
|| Exceptionally well-presented tasks, with both clear overview and detail
|| Very good task descriptions. The ranking is justified. Presented at the right level
|| most tasks very good, some lacking in definition, ranking or coverage
|| most important tasks present but some missing and others in the wrong order
|| Minimal coverage of tasks.
|| not enough tasks poorly presented and severely lacking.
|| No, or irrelevant tasks
|| This is where the student reflects on what they have learnt from the persona generation task, the task creation, and thinking about the system as a whole.
|| Exceptionally deep analysis of learning and understanding of the role of Design thinking
|| Very clear understanding of the learning objectives and reflection on what has been learnt
|| Student reflects on learning but is missing some analysis or understanding of the role of the parts of the assignment
|| some analysis of learning and understanding, Some bits good, other parts lacking
|| minimal content, mostly just saying what was done with no thought about what was learnt
|| No real reflection. Comments on student work without context
|| The student does not show any learning