SWEN502 (2021) Assignment One - Personas and Requirements

Due 17th October 2021

This is documentation of the work you have done over the week learning about HCI.

You will report on a project from one of these areas:

  • Augmented Reality games and/or education content
  • Mental Health
  • Political compass
  • Carbon footprint

Your report will contain 6 parts.

  • Part 1, Into a short introduction (1/2 page) to the project and what it is about.

  • Part 2, Personas with 1 page per persona or 2 personas on a page. 2 personas (4 personas for pairs).

  • Part 3, Essential use case - 4 use-cases (6 in pairs) with one expanded to a User Journey.

  • Part 4, Figma prototype of the system you created at least 4 "screens" (frames with transitions, probably 12 – 24 would be normal, most are copies of previous frames.)

  • Part 5, Testing report - what problems the testing identified and what improvements would be made. Comment on accessibility. (Same for pair or individual

  • Part 6, Reflection - <1 page (more if you want but <1 page is sufficient) on insights and learning from the week including personas, scenarios, and journey. (Each individual writes their own reflections even when working in a pair)

Submission

You will submit a pdf containing the 6 parts above with a link to the Figma files you created.

Rubric

Category

Description

Default

Range

Description

Pt1,2&3 Personas and tasks clear and useful for design

30%

10 – 40%

Prototype

Pt4 The figma design and prototype

30%

20 – 50%

Testing

Pt5 Feedback and interpretation

20%

10 – 30%

Reflection

Pt6 What was learnt and takeaway for next project

20%

10 – 30%

Category

10-9

8-7

6-5

4-0

Description

Impressive, excellent presentation

Followed instructions

Missed parts, got general principle

Large gaps or missing

Prototype

Very well laid out, great flow, covers important use cases

Working prototype, covers minimum

Missing interactions and bad layout

Not clickable / confusing design

Testing

Good process and analysis of results

Did testing and provided data

Missed parts of the testing

Missing testing and no analysis

Reflection

Insightful analysis independent thought

Understand the objective of the content

Reported what was done

Missed the point/random comments